OT! Let us scientificly determine...

how much wood a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood!LETS DO THE MATH PEOPLE!OT! Let us scientificly determine...
The same amount of pickled pickles peter piper can pick. OT! Let us scientificly determine...
No. :
|Seventy-five.
*dies*
Some say it depends on three factors:

-The woodchuck's desire to chuck said wood.
-The woodchuck's need to chuck the aforementioned wood.
-The woodchuck's ability to chuck the wood.If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word ''if'' from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood. Source: [url]http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_wood_could_a_woodchuck_chuck_if_a_woodchuck_could_chuck_wood[/url]
Around 100 ... divided by zero.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
[QUOTE=''Theokhoth'']This topic has sensual innuendo written all over it.Giggity. [/QUOTE]

No.....That's just you.
[QUOTE=''Theokhoth'']This topic has sensual innuendo written all over it.Giggity. [/QUOTE]Thank god, I'm not the only one who immediately thought that.  
[QUOTE=''paulbunker85''][QUOTE=''Theokhoth'']This topic has sensual innuendo written all over it.Giggity. [/QUOTE]

No.....That's just you.[/QUOTE]

I beg to differ.
[QUOTE=''Theokhoth''] This topic has sensual innuendo written all over it.Giggity. [/QUOTE]Wow. Your thoughts have begun to infect my once pure mind.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
[QUOTE=''Theokhoth''][QUOTE=''Silverbond''][QUOTE=''Theokhoth''] This topic has sensual innuendo written all over it.Giggity. [/QUOTE]Wow. Your thoughts have begun to infect my once pure mind.[/QUOTE]It's the gay rubbing off onto you. [/QUOTE]*stares at Theokhoth lovingly*
we have gotten way of track. please mods kill this now!
[QUOTE=''Theokhoth'']It's the gay rubbing off onto you. [/QUOTE]Quick, Silverbond, run!  Run before it's too late!   Also, does that leave a trail of glitter?  :D  ..I'm sorry.